INSIGHTS

Tuesday (June 23, 2026) morning in Seoul (South Korea), investors watched the KOSPI 200 do something it had never done before. By the closing bell, South Korea's benchmark index, the country's answer to the S&P 500, had shed nearly 10% in a single session. Worst day in its history. Most American investors clocked the headline and kept scrolling. It needs some attention. Here's why: different countries specialize in different industries, and that gives their markets a kind of

Whenever investors discuss SpaceX, the conversation usually starts in the same place: valuation. Is it worth $2 trillion? $3 trillion? Is it overhyped? Has all the upside already been priced in? Those are reasonable questions. But they may not be the most interesting ones. The more interesting question may be whether we are thinking about SpaceX the right way. Most comparisons focus on other large companies. Some compare it to Nvidia. Others compare it to railroads, telecommu

How many times have you heard someone ask, "Which AI company will be the winner?" Maybe it's OpenAI. Maybe it's Google. Maybe it's a company that hasn't even been founded yet. Investors naturally gravitate toward these questions because they are easy to understand. We want to identify the next big winner before everyone else does. But history suggests there may be a better question to ask. Think about previous technological revolutions. During the California Gold Rush, fortu

Concentration risk rarely begins with a bad decision. It usually begins with a very good one. A stock doubles, then doubles again, and what started as a modest allocation quietly becomes the dominant force in a portfolio. This happens in two common ways. Investors have seen it play out vividly in the AI trade of 2025 and 2026. Memory stocks and AI infrastructure names: Micron, AMD, Samsung Electronics, delivered extraordinary returns for those who positioned early. What fel

Every investor wants certainty. Where markets are headed, what interest rates will do next, whether stocks will continue rallying or move into a correction. Investors spend enormous amounts of time searching for forecasts, signals, and predictions that can provide clarity about what comes next. The reality is simple: Not retail investors. Not advisors. Not institutional money managers. Even the most experienced investors operate with incomplete information and uncertainty. Ma

Most portfolios today are still built on an idea that made sense in a different market era. The 60/40 Problem The 60/40 portfolio — sold for decades as “balanced” — failed investors when both stocks and bonds dropped together. The industry’s fix? Repackage it as direct indexing. Better wrapper, same passive bet. And until recently, even that was only available to ultra-HNI clients and institutions. Investors deserve more. We think investors deserve better than that. Direct In

1968 was the worst possible time to retire. Not because stocks crashed overnight. Not because one catastrophic event wiped out a generation of savers. But because inflation showed up — and didn’t leave. That’s the part most people get wrong. They think the big risk is a crash, a sudden drawdown, something obvious. It’s not. The real risk is slow. It grinds. It sits there year after year, quietly destroying your purchasing power while your portfolio looks “fine” on the surface